Skip to content

Comparison

Difference Between C2 and C3 on an EICR

Written by Regis ComplianceTechnically reviewed by NAPIT-registered competent personLast reviewed June 2026

C2 is potentially dangerous and fails an EICR, requiring urgent remedial work; C3 is a non-urgent improvement recommendation that keeps the report Satisfactory.

C2 and C3 are the two codes most often confused, because both describe items that are not immediately dangerous. The crucial difference is that C2 fails the report and C3 does not.

C2 — potentially dangerous

A C2 means a fault or change of conditions could make the installation dangerous. It requires urgent remedial action and makes the report Unsatisfactory.

C3 — improvement recommended

A C3 means the item is not dangerous and complies with the safety principles, but could be improved — often because the installation predates a newer requirement. It does not fail the report; the outcome stays Satisfactory.

Why the boundary matters

The line between C2 and C3 is where professional judgement counts most. An over-cautious inspector may code improvements as C2 (creating unnecessary "failures" and remedial cost); a lax one may downgrade real risks to C3. This is why a competent, experienced inspector matters.

C2 C3
Nature Potentially dangerous Improvement recommended
Report outcome Unsatisfactory Satisfactory
Action Urgent remedial Optional / good practice

For the specific question of whether C3 items ever fail a report, see does a C3 fail an EICR.

This article provides general guidance and distinguishes legislation, British Standards and good practice. It is not legal advice. Always confirm the specific duties applying to your property and tenure.

Speak to a compliance engineer

The quickest way to get started is a quick call. We'll tell you exactly what you need.

We use essential cookies to run this site. With your consent we also use analytics and marketing cookies to improve the site and measure our advertising. See our cookie policy.